(Reporter correspondent Song Hua Tang Hongjie Liu Yu) Xu people withdraw money at ATMs, the left hand is the person next to drag a bit, back to the moment in his bank card was transferred packet, then Cary 6,000 yuan that was twice removed. Xu did not do a bank security obligation on the grounds of the bank to court recently, Humen, Dongguan City, the second court hearing the case the court rejected the Xu's claim.

be transferred back to the moment the bank card package

April 27 at 7 pm, Xu Humen in a bank within a self-service bank ATM to withdraw funds ,Moncler Outlet, press the button wait withdrawals of $ 200 ATM money, the left by others dragged a bit, Xu subconsciously back. A thirties a few feet six tall middle-aged man holding a bank card, asked him: I walked away. back and took out $ 200 to put out by unscrupulous elements bayonet bank card. Criminals immediately stepped forward to operate ATMs, the card will Xu left out.

Court: Bank through no fault of

April 28, Xu to the bank of a branch office in Dongguan check that the card is 6000 yuan of deposits obtained in two to go. Informed of this situation, Xu is on the same day to a branch in Dongguan Humen Taiping Municipal Public Security Bureau police station. Subsequently, Xu sued the bank Humen, Dongguan City, the second court to court seeking compensation for their losses 6000.

Court held that, because Xu in the process of using bank cards negligence, not by ATM on the The bank card removed, resulting in stolen bank card, the card money was stolen, it shall bear the resulting losses.

court said that under the bank card agreement, where the passwords match, the transaction shall be deemed authorized by the cardholder himself or my legal transactions, the bank only the authenticity of bank cards bear the identification and password are consistent with the obligations. Case, the real criminals with the correct password, and bank card withdrawals, through no fault of banks, requiring banks to take responsibility for Xu reason not to set up,fitch paris,Abercrombie Paris, Xu's petition for the court not support it. Therefore, the court and dismissed the claims Xu's decision, the decision is currently in force.